History of Video Game Assignment Grading Parameters - Prof. E. Bertozzi
Game Review Rubric (excellent – e, good – g, fair – f, missing or poor – m)
- Review is well-organized with an introduction, discussion, and conclusion ()
- Minimum 3 citations in correct APA format ()
- Review includes historical context for game ()
- Consideration of relevant hardware/console and software elements and how they affected game development and gameplay ()
- Consideration of social, cultural, and political issues relating to content or impact of game ()
- Critical analysis of game mechanic, feedback, player experience, and narrative ()
- Review is free of grammatical, typographical and other errors in writing ()
Reading Response Rubric
- Response demonstrates a nuanced reading of the text ()
- Citations and links to external sources support your assertions ()
- Response demonstrates reading and consideration of other students' postings ()
- Response is a critical analysis of the text and not a report ()
In-Class Game Presentation Rubric (excellent – e, good – g, fair – f, missing or poor – m)
- Class gameplay was well-organized and without technology issues ()
- All students were involved and engaged in gameplay ()
- Presentation included discussion of historical context ()
- Presentation detailed reasons for the historical importance of the game ()
- Presenter led useful discussion critique of the game ()
- Students were provided with mnemonic to help them remember game for the final ()